## Pages

### What's the deal with extraneous solutions when solving radical equations?

What's the deal with those extraneous solutions we get when solving radical equations? Why do we get two answers but sometimes have to throw out one or even both? In this post I share a video explaining through graphs the answers we get when solving radical equations. It's easier to answer this question by asking another question first: What are radical functions? Radical functions are inverses to quadratic functions, except for one little thing... half of their graphs. Because if radicals were parabolas on their sides, 1-to-1 with every point on their quadratic graph inverse, they wouldn't be functions:

Above is a quadratic and the quadratic reflected over the y=x axis. The problem is that the red graph is not a function. It's a radical with its imaginary half showing.

In order for the red graph to be a function, we have to throw out half of it. Now we have a quadratic and its radical inverse:

Now that we got that out of the way, let's look at an equation √(x + 7) = x + 5 on the grid. We'll graph it as y = √(x + 7) and y = x + 5 to solve.

If we were to solve algebraically, we'd get two solutions: x = -6 and x = -3:

By plugging in, we'd find that x = -3 is a solution and x = -6 is an extraneous solution.

But what if that other half of our radical still existed?

Look at that! If our radical was a parabola's 1-to-1 inverse, it would intersect y=x + 5 at our extraneous solution x = -6!

Here is a video:

In the video I mention a graphing radical cheat sheet, That can be found here: